Sitemap

Day 15: Democratize AI? No — Domesticate it! — LangFlow vs Flowwise vs Dify vs…

100 days of Agentic AI: From foundations to Autonomous workflows

4 min readJun 15, 2025

Here’s how I see this landscape — there are Agentic AI tools in your reach where we don’t have to always code in the likes of Langraph or CrewAI or Autogen or OpenAI Agent SDK etc. Especially Citizen developers or your users can now use these like your PowerBI or Excel or Tableau.

1. Audience & Use-Case Drive the Choice

Citizen developers & rapid prototyping for building Agentic AI Dify

  • Its ultra-lean component set and built-in UI generation mean you can stand up a working chatbot or extraction workflow in minutes. The “run history” logs and sandboxed Python make debugging painless, even if you can’t pip-install pandas.
Image by author — Local installation of Dify using Docker image

Power users & deep customizationLangflow

  • Want full control over every component’s code? Langflow’s inline code editor and modular “Agent” nodes give you that power. The trade-off is a steeper learning curve — and you’ll need to keep an eye on stability as the project evolves.
Image by author — Local installation of Langflow using Docker image
  • Self-hosted simplicityFlowise
  • If your top priority is a rock-solid, entirely self-hosted stack with basic conditional flows, Flowise fits. It won’t dazzle with loops or nested workflows, but it’s extremely stable and predictable.
Image from Flowise

Enterprise MS shopsCopilot Studio

  • Already committed to Azure, Teams, and Power Platform? Copilot Studio plugs right in — no extra hosting, no new vendor contracts. Just remember you’re bounded by Microsoft’s topic model and limited debug tools.

2. Beyond the Low-Code Canvas

Regardless of platform, you’ll need a rock-solid DataOps and MLOps foundation to be able to be integratable so that we can build efficient Agentic AIworkflow.

  1. Data Ingestion & Orchestration
  • Tools: Airbyte, Fivetran, Prefect, Airflow

2. Storage & Formats

  • Lakehouse (Iceberg, Delta, Parquet), vector stores (Qdrant, Milvus)

3. Metadata & Catalog

  • DataHub, Amundsen, OpenMetadata

4. Quality & Lineage

  • Great Expectations, Monte Carlo, open-source lineage in DataHub

5. LLMOps & Monitoring

  • LangSmith, Langfuse, OpenTelemetry, Prometheus
  • Low-code is only one layer. The robustness of your end-to-end platform hinges on these pieces talking smoothly together.

3. My Pick for a Full-Stack “Citizen-Build” Platform

If I had to pick one open-source, self-hosted solution to hand over to non-technical stakeholders tomorrow:

  • Backend orchestration in a React Flow–powered UI
  • Workflows defined with Dify or Langflow beneath the hood (for its logging and iteration)
  • Vector search via self-hosted Qdrant with metadata filters
  • Metadata catalog with OpenMetadata
  • LLMOps integration via Langfuse self-hosted
  • Cursor AI or Windsurf to build apps

This hybrid approach lets you expose a simple drag-and-drop canvas to business users (React Flow + custom panels), while the guts are powered by battle-tested open-source engines.

4. Where the Industry Is Headed

  • Marketplace & Reuse: We’ll see curated component stores — one-click connectors for enterprise data sources, custom agents for domain tasks.
  • Tighter MLOps: Real-time observability, automated retraining triggers, chargeback reporting.
  • Collaborative Editing: Real-time pairing in workflow editors, version diffing, and merge conflict resolution.

5. How to Install local version of these Agentic AI Tools

Beauty is all are open source.

Step 1: Install Docker Desktop / for Mac.

Source: Image by author
Source: Image by author

Step 2: Pull the relevant docker image and run the local instances for Langflow or Flowise or Dify.

Bottom Line

No single tool “wins.” Your choice depends on who’s building, how fast they need it, and whether you’re willing to trade flexibility for simplicity. Low-code will continue to mature, but the real differentiator will be how well these platforms integrate into your existing data ops and MLOps ecosystem.

Source: Image by Author

Key takeaways:

  • Choose Dify if you want the lowest barrier for business users, rich nested-flow logic, built-in chat UI and full debugging/experiment tracking — at the cost of a more restrictive license.
  • Choose Langflow if you need maximum flexibility with real Python components, an MIT-licensed codebase, and you have engineering resources to tame its learning curve.
  • Choose Flowise when you want an open-source Apache-licensed middle ground with embeddable UI and Python-code support, but can live without advanced loops, nested-flow debugging or on-prem LLMOps.

What resonates most with you and your team’s priorities?

--

--

LAKSHMI VENKATESH
LAKSHMI VENKATESH

Written by LAKSHMI VENKATESH

I learn by Writing; Data, AI, Cloud and Technology. All the views expressed here are my own views and does not represent views of my firm that I work for.

No responses yet